Kalimba Tines Follow-up

by Bart on September 28, 2009

In the previous post I raised the question of what might be the mathematical relationship between length and pitch in kalimba tines and similar vibrating bodies.  (I had to add a bunch of specific limitations to make the situation mathematically manageable; you can see the details in the original post preceding this one.)  Based on empirical observation, I speculated parenthetically that there might be an inverse-squared relationship (e.g., halving the length would quadruple the frequency). Phill Styles, of the physics department at North Carolina State University, sent this comment:

The square root of the length applies when and only when the bar/rod is so rigid clamped that there is no motion at the point and no slope/bending.  In a kalimba, the bar/rod rests on a stop, where most people measure from, and then continues to a poor clamp.  Because of this the conditions on the bar are not uniform as you mentioned so it doesn’t come out just right.  Not bad tho in some cases.  Easy to understand in the treatment given in “The Physics of Musical Instruments,” second edition pg.64 case b.  The book is written by Fletcher and Rossing.,  USBN 0-387-98374-0. A great book. 

 

… And this fits well with my observations, in which the relevent factor appeared to be just a bit  little less than what the inverse-squared factor would have been. A less-than-perfect immobility/rigidity at the mounting nicely accounts for this “just a bit less.”  Thanks to Phill for this, as well as to Tom Rossing and Neville Fletcher.   

 A couple of times people have asked me what the mathematical relationship is between length and pitch in kalimba tines and other sorts of plucked rods held at one end.  My answer has always been “I don’t know.” I’ve never run across this information myself, and I’ve often wondered. 

I wasn’t able to intuit my way to a physical analysis of the situation which would point the way to a formula, so I recently tested the question empirically. That’s a fancy way of saying that I spent a few minutes in my shop setting up rods of different lengths and noting what pitches they produced, looking for a consistent relationship between length and pitch. 

Here, in brief, is what I found:

 

Given a rod or tine of length L, to make it produce a tone an octave higher, it should be shortened to approx .685L.   For an octave below, lengthen to approx  1.460L. 

 

From this, a bit of math tells us that the semitone-up would be at 0.9699L, and the semitone down would be 1.0320L. You can arrive at other intervals in 12-tone equal temperament by repeatedly applying the semitone-up or semitone-down factor.

 

BUT WAIT!  Please don’t take these observations as gospel, or at least please do read the following notes before working with them.

First keep in mind that these numbers only work for uniform rods or tines. They won’t work if the tines are irregularly shaped – say, thicker at the far end — or if you’re comparing two tines of different thickness or diameter.  Also, the tines shouldn’t be significantly bent over at the end. 

Second, I should mention that my testing set-up and observations weren’t all that precise, and my results weren’t perfectly consistent. The octave-up factor ranged from about .67 to .69.  (I notice that these results are fairly close to the the square root of 1/2 at .7071, which sugggests the possibility of an inverse-squared relationship between length and pitch, but I’m just speculating here.) 

 

I’m wondering if anyone reading this has performed similar experiments. Or, whether have any readers come across or come up with a theoretical formula for this relationship.  This news page isn’t currently set up for reader comments are present, so if you can add to the discussion, please email me at emi@windworld.com.    

 

Online Payments — I think We’re Good Now

by Bart on September 9, 2009

Here’s what I hope will be my last posting concerning online payments for visitors to our catalog: We’re now able to take all major credit cards as well as PayPal.  Most people’s payments, both within and without the U.S.,  seem to be coming through OK. So if you had any earlier trouble with payment in our online catalog, please don’t hesitate to give it another try (click the catalog button above to get into the catalog).  Remember too that you can always order offline if you prefer … info here.

Pop Guns

by Bart on September 3, 2009

A few years ago Phil Dadson and I put out a book on plosive aerophones and how to make them. Plosive aerophones is the generic term for things like slap tubes, udu drums, and other instruments in which a body of air is excited by percussion or other sudden  agitation. Sometime after the book was printed, I had a sudden realization: we forgot to include POP GUNS!  Too bad, because pop guns do qualify as plosives, and their sound is one of my favorites. 

As it happens, I did include a section on pop guns, in an earlier book, Funny Noises for the Connoisseur. So if you want the full story of popguns, that’s where to look.  But for a quick start, a short primer on the topic follows here.

Here’s a sketch showing the essentials of a pop gun.

pop-gun-diagram

The idea is to have a tube with a cork lodged in one end. From the other end the player pushes a snug-fitting plunger forward. This compresses the air and forces the cork to pop out, producing the popping sound.

Notice that two corks are needed, the popping cork and the plunger cork. Both have the truncated cone shape, with the large end a little larger than the inside tube diameter, and the small end a little smaller. The plunger cork serves as the piston-plug on the end of the plunger, fitting the inside of the tube closely so as to push the air through. To get that fit, stick the cork in one end of the tube as far as it will go. Cut off the portion that is still sticking out and discard. Sand the cork remaining in the tube flush with the tube end, and then remove it from the tube (push it out from the other side by poking through with a narrow stick or dowel).

At the end where the popping cork is to be inserted, use a rat tail file or similar tool to bevel the tube edges inward. Even if you do a somewhat sloppy job of this, it seems to help the popping effect.

The string that you can see in the drawing prevents the popping cork from flying away and getting lost. It also lets you pull the cork back into popping position simply by pulling the plunger back. The string length should be a little less than the tube length.

The drawing should tell you everything else you need to know. And to give you an idea of the sound you’re after, here’s recording of pop music.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

A pop gun can produce a variety of tones, depending on how firmly the popping cork is seated, how rapidly you move the plunger, and how far you draw the plunger back before starting the forward thrust.

Another sound I get a kick out of, closely related to pop gun pops, is suction pops (think of the sound of a cork being pulled out of a bottle). Maybe in another post I’ll talk more about them.  Suction pop devices are less variable and more predictable in their sound, and it’s possible to tune suction poppers to definite pitches.   

PayPal is now OK for online catalog orders

by Bart on September 3, 2009

Following a flurry of activity in response to a lot of unhappy customers, we’ve now set things up so we can take PayPal payments through the online catalog on this website.  Look for a radio button that allows you to choose either credit card or PayPal just below the address information on the shopping cart page.  As for credit cards, we currently can take MasterCard and Visa. With another flurry of activity underway, we’re hoping to be able to take American Express and Discover cards soon. 

Getting our newly revamped online catalog set up for payment methods other than MasterCharge and Visa cards has proven to be more of a problem than we anticipated.  We’re working on solutions now; hopeful that we’ll be offering the full line of payment options online soon.  In the meantime, if your preferred payment method is anything other than MC or Visa, you can always order offline, where we can accept a wide range of payment types.  Details here.   

Documentary film on Trimpin

by Bart on August 26, 2009

Trimpin, as many readers will know but some may not, is surely one of the most extraordinary sound artists working today — a powerful example of mechanical genius in the service of the most inventive ideas for sound and motion.  He’s also the sort of artist who is highly focused on his work and not at all focused on such things as publicity. As a result there hasn’t always been a lot documentation of his work.    

Now San Francisco film maker Peter Esmonde has created Trimpin: The Sound of Invention,  a full-length documentary. It’s top-notch work in all respects; a pleasure to see and hear and an excellent primer on Trimpin’s sound explorations.  It’s now making the rounds of major film festivals.  Get schedules and more information at http://www.trimpinmovie.com/.

Sound is Art online magazine

by Bart on August 26, 2009

Margaret Noble writes “I have started a new ezine that sort of functions as a museum of unique sound recordings. ” It contains postings from lots of  people and places in the form of descriptions and sound files for exploratory sound work. Included are various sorts of field recordings and sound collages, as well as lots of exotic instrumenhts.  Examples from current postings: Sounds of Medicine (internal body sounds), a glass kalimba (actually plexiglas), Euler’s Disk (a system for capturiing intriguing and impressive sounds from a spinning disk), The Junk Yard (notes and a sound sample on a long out-of-print 1964 folkways LP devoted to junkyard sounds).  And much more — great stuff! Go to http://margaretnoble.net/blog/.


A Week or So Later

by Bart on August 21, 2009

Our new web site has been up for a week or so now (see the previous post for my celebratory announcement of the launch).  Not surprisingly there have been a few glitches. We’ve been diligently trying to catch and correct them.  If you’ve had any difficulties with the site please stick with us; I think we’ve got almost everything in hand by now.   You’ll know we’re cruising along nicely when I stop posting notes about web site upgrades and start posting about the world of experimusical instruments.

Major Website Overhaul

by Bart on August 13, 2009

As old friends will notice, we’ve just undergone a major web site overhaul. Man, it’s been a lot of work! One of our main purposes has been to improve the site’s usability for visitors. Your experiences in navigating, finding the features and information you want, and purchasing from the catalog should now be more convenient and intuitive. The upgrade has been deftly managed by Janine Warner of Artesian Media.

The main software components we’re now working with are Wordpress for creating most of the text and feature pages, and Instinct for the product pages and shopping cart functions, both extensively customized for our purposes. For secure online payment processing we’re using a service called Authorize.net. Authorize.net is widely used and universally trusted; when it comes to making sure that your payments are safe and your information fully encrypted, they’re among the leaders.

I mentioned Wordpress as one of the programs we’re using. Wordpress was created as blogging software, designed to make it easy to manage pages with frequent updates. In the past, frequent updates has definitely not been my forte, and I don’t expect to suddenly transform myself into a high-frequency blogger now. But this raises some hope that I could start doing a better job of keeping this news page and other pages on this site current. If it goes well, maybe I can even revive some of the spirit of the old Experimental Musical Instruments quarterly, allowing this space to serve, in some limited fashion, as meeting place for people interested in the topic. No promises, but we’ll see.